|
|
- Written by Salomone Donghwa Shin / International Legal Research Institute. www.ilri.co.kr
Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Relief
Form Number: Pro Se 12
Category: Civil Pro Se Forms
Effective onDecember 1, 2016
2022년 11월 2일 현재 미국 법원에서 사용중인 민사소송 Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Relief 서식입니다.
경합권리자확정소송 Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Relief 은 미국의 복합소송제도로 둘 이상의 당사자가 동일한 재산이나 금전을 제3자인 보험회사나 금융기관에 청구할 때 이 분쟁중인 재산이나 금전의 적법한 청구권자를 확신하지 못하는 경우에 사용됩니다.
경합권리자 Interpleader에 대해서 법원은 어느 당사자가 재산이나 금전에 대한 청구권을 가지고 있는지 결정하고 제3자에게 적법하게 양도하도록 명령합니다.
선고확정에 대해서 법원은 분쟁에 연루된 당사자의 법적 권리와 의무에 대한 결정을 합니다.
경합권리자확정 Interpleader 및 Declaratory Relief 에 대한 소송은 중립적인 제3자 neutral third parties 가 재산이나 금전 분쟁에 휘말리는 것을 방지 avoid getting caught in the middle of disputes over property or money 하고 관련 당사자의 권리와 의무를 법원이 결정할 수 있도록 to seek a determination from the court about the rights and obligations of the parties involved 하는 중요한 법적 수단 legal tool 입니다.
다음은 미국 법원의 경합권리자확정소송 판례입니다.
1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Pacific Enterprises(1994): 이 사건에서 보험회사는 두 회사 중 어느 회사가 책임보험증권의 수익금을 받을 자격이 있는지 결정하기 위해 중재 소송을 제기했고 법원은 중재를 승인하고 보험회사에 분쟁이 해결될 때까지 수익금을 법원에 예치하도록 명령했음.
2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Swann(2003): 이 사건에서 보험회사는 두 명의 청구인 중 누가 생명보험의 보험금을 수령할 자격이 있는지 결정하기 위해 중재 소송을 제기했고 법원은 중재를 승인하고 보험 회사에 분쟁이 해결될 때까지 수익금을 법원에 예치하도록 명령했음.
3. Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation(2008): 이 사건에서 여러 통신회사는 저소득 가정을 위한 통화료 보조금을 지급하는 연방프로그램에 지불할 책임이 있는 회사를 결정하기 위해 중재 소송을 제기했고 법원은 중재를 승인하고 회사들에게 분쟁이 해결될 때까지 분쟁금을 법원에 예치하도록 명령했음.
다음은 미국 대법원의 경합권리자확정소송 판례입니다.
1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth (1937): 이 사건은 누가생명보험정책의수익자자격이있는지의분쟁을해결하기위해중재자소송을제
기한보험회사 an insurance company that filed an interpleader action to resolve a dispute over who was entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy 에 대해서 대법원은 분쟁의금액이관할기준금액보다적은경우라도연방법원이중재자소송관할권을갖
는다 federal courts have jurisdiction over interpleader actions even when the amount in controversy is less than the jurisdictional threshold 고 판결.
2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. (1941): 이 사건은 청구인둘중에서누가채권의수익자자격이있는지를결정하기위해중재자소송을 제기한보증보험사 a surety company filed an interpleader action to determine which of two claimants was entitled to the proceeds of a bond 의 소송이 적법한지에 대해서 대법원은 원고인보증보험사가실제로책임을부담하지는않았지만여러가지책임이발생할가
능성이있는상황에서이소송이적법하다 interpleader is available in situations where the plaintiff has not incurred any actual liability, but faces the potential for multiple liability 고 판결.
3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States (1944): 이 사건은 계약자를대신해서채권을발행한보증보험사가제기한중재자소송과관련 involved an interpleader action filed by a surety company that had issued bonds on behalf of a contractor 사건으로 대법원은 보증보험사가채권의액면가를초과하는금액에대해책임이없다고선언할자격이있
다 the surety company was entitled to a declaration that it was not liable for any amounts beyond the face value of the bonds 고 판결.
4. Prudential Insurance Co. v. Hovis(1982): 이 사건은 누가생명보험금수익자자격이있는지를결정하기위해보험회사가제기한중재자소
송과관련involved an interpleader action filed by an insurance company to determine who was entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy 된 사건에서 대법원은 원고가기본분쟁에서중립을유지할필요가없으며,청구권의타당성대한입장을 표명할수있다 an interpleader plaintiff is not required to remain neutral in the underlying dispute, and may take a position on the merits of the claims 고 판결.
각 국가의 법원들은 고유의 소송 서식을 사용하므로 더 추가되는 내용들이 있지만 기본적으로 요구하는 내용은 크게 다르지 않아서 다른 국가와 비슷한 사건일 경우 본 내용을 참고하시기 바랍니다.
소송이 필요한 국가의 현지 변호사와 상담이나 번역과 통역을 원하시면 이메일 info@ilri.co.kr 로 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.
Pro Se 12 (Rev. 12/16) Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Relief
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
__________ District of __________
Case No.
(to be filled in by the Clerk’s Office)
Plaintiff(s)
(Write the full name of each plaintiff who is filing this complaint.
If the names of all the plaintiffs cannot fit in the space above,
please write “see attached” in the space and attach an additional
page with the full list of names.)
-v-
Defendant(s)
(Write the full name of each defendant who is being sued. If the
names of all the defendants cannot fit in the space above, please
write “see attached” in the space and attach an additional page
with the full list of names.)
COMPLAINT FOR INTERPLEADER AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
I. The Parties to This Complaint
A. The Plaintiff(s) in Interpleader
Provide the information below for each plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach additional pages if
needed.
Name
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
B. The Defendant(s) in Interpleader
Provide the information below for each defendant named in the complaint, whether the defendant is an
individual, a government agency, an organization, or a corporation. For an individual defendant,
include the person’s job or title (if known). Attach additional pages if needed.
Defendant No. 1
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Defendant No. 2
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Defendant No. 3
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Defendant No. 4
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
II. Basis for Jurisdiction and Venue
There are two types of interpleader actions, each brought under a different provision. Which type of
interpleader action are you bringing? (check one)
ㅁ I am bringing this interpleader action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22. (Fill out Section
A below.)
ㅁ I am bringing this interpleader action under 28 U.S.C. § 1335. (Fill out Section B below.)
A. Interpleader Action Under Rule 22
1. Jurisdiction is proper because the action (check all that apply):
ㅁ arises under a federal statute, a federal treaty, and/or a provision of the United States
Constitution (specify the relevant statutory, treaty, and/or constitutional provisions):
ㅁ meets the jurisdictional requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1332, under which no plaintiff
may be a citizen of the same State as any defendant, and the amount at stake must
exceed the sum or value of $75,000:
a. The Plaintiff(s)
i. If the plaintiff is an individual
The plaintiff, (name) , is a
citizen of the State of (name) .
ii. If the plaintiff is a corporation
The plaintiff, (name) , is
incorporated under the laws of the State of (name) ,
and has its principal place of business in the State of (name)
(If more than one plaintiff is named in the complaint, attach an additional page
providing the same information for each additional plaintiff.)
b. The Defendant(s)
i. If the defendant is an individual
The defendant, (name ) , is a
citizen of the State of (name ) .
Or is a citizen of (foreign nation) .
ii. If the defendant is a corporation
The defendant, (name) , is
incorporated under the laws of the State of (name ) ,
and has its principal place of business in the State of (name)
. Or is incorporated under the laws of
(foreign nation) , and has its principal place of
business in (name) .
(If more than one defendant is named in the complaint, attach an additional page
providing the same information for each additional defendant.)
c. The Amount in Controversy
The amount in controversy–the amount the plaintiff claims the defendant owes or the amount at
stake–is more than $75,000, not counting interest and costs of court, because (explain):
2. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because (check one):
ㅁ all of the defendants live in _____________________________ (a common State) and at least
one defendant lives _________________________________________________________ (county, State), which is located in this court’s judicial district.
ㅁ a substantial part of the property that is the subject of this complaint for interpleader is
situated in ____________________________________________________(county, State), which is located
in this court’s judicial district.
ㅁ there is no district in which this action may otherwise be brought. The court has
personal jurisdiction over the defendants for the following reasons (identify the connections
the defendants have with the judicial district):
B. Interpleader Action Under 28 U.S.C. § 1335
1. In order for this court to have jurisdiction over this action, at least two defendants must be citizens
of different States as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) or (c), and the value of the property in
controversy must be at least $500.
a. Interpleader Defendant No. 1
i. If the defendant is an individual
The defendant, (name) , is
a citizen of the State of (name) .
Or is a citizen of (foreign nation ) .
ii. If the defendant is a corporation
The defendant, (name) , is
incorporated under the laws of the State of (name) ,
and has its principal place of business in the State of (name)
_____________________________. Or is incorporated under the laws of
(foreign nation) _______________________ , and has its principal place of
business in (name) _________________________.
b. Interpleader Defendant No. 2
i. If the defendant is an individual
The defendant, (name) ________________________________________ , is
a citizen of the State of (name) _______________________________________.
____________________________ Or is a citizen of (foreign nation) .
ii. If the defendant is a corporation
The defendant, (name) __________________________________, is
incorporated under the laws of the State of (name) __________________________,
and has its principal place of business in the State of (name)
_____________________________________________________. Or is incorporated under the laws of
(foreign nation) __________________________________________ , and has its principal place of
business in (name) ________________________________________.
c. The Property in Controversy
The property in controversy is worth $ .
2. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1397 because at least one defendant, (name)
______________________________________________________________________
___________________, resides in
____________________________________________________________________(c
ounty, State), which is located in this court’s
judicial district.
III. Statement of Interpleader Action
A. Describe the property that is the subject of this interpleader action, and explain why you are in
possession of the property. Explain why each of the defendants claims an entitlement to the property.
B. Plaintiff has (check one):
ㅁ deposited (the property at issue) into the registry of the court
ㅁ given a bond payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $ , which
the court has deemed proper and which is conditioned upon compliance by the plaintiff with
the future order or judgment of the court with respect to the subject matter of the
controversy.
C. Explain why you are in great doubt as to which defendant(s) is/are entitled to the property subject to the
interpleader action. Explain why you cannot determine which claim(s) is/are valid without exposing
yourself to potential double litigation.
IV. Relief
The plaintiff requests that (check all that apply):
ㅁ Each defendant be restrained from instituting any action against the plaintiff for recovery of the
property or any part of it.
ㅁ The defendants be required to interplead and settle among themselves their rights to the property and
that the plaintiff be discharged from all liability.
ㅁ The plaintiff recover costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
ㅁ The court grant any further relief as may be just and proper under the circumstances of this case.
V. Certification and Closing
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, by signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge, information,
and belief that this complaint: (1) is not being presented for an improper purpose, such as to harass, cause
unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; (2) is supported by existing law or by a
nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law; (3) the factual contentions have
evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable
opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the complaint otherwise complies with the
requirements of Rule 11.
A. For Parties Without an Attorney
I agree to provide the Clerk’s Office with any changes to my address where case–related papers may be
served. I understand that my failure to keep a current address on file with the Clerk’s Office may result
in the dismissal of my case.
Date of signing:
Signature of Plaintiff
Printed Name of Plaintiff
B. For Attorneys
Date of signing:
Signature of Attorney
Printed Name of Attorney
Bar Number9
Name of Law Firm
Street Address
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
고도의 국제법 전문가 그룹 - 국제법률연구원
Highly specialized in international law ㅡ International Legal Research Institute
Email 📮 info@ilri.co.kr Website 🌎 www.ilri.co.kr
📞 [Korea 82] (0)507-1350-0621, (0)2-557-3476 📱 (0)10-5295-0621
(Free E-mail Consultation: Please send your inquiry to info@ilri.co.kr for consultation with lawyers in different time zone countries.)
Law Dept. (0)507-1351-0621 law@ilri.co.kr | Education Dept. (0)507-1352-0621 education@ilri.co.kr | Finance Dept. (0)507-1353-0621 finance@ilri.co.kr | Administration Dept. administration@ilri.co.kr | Press Dept. press@ilri.co.kr
#국제법 #국제계약 #국제법률연구원 #신동화 #International Law #ilri #ILRI #International Legal Research Institute #ilri.co.kr |
|
|
)
)
)
)
