|
|
- Written by Salomone Donghwa Shin / International Legal Research Institute. www.ilri.co.kr
Third Party Complaint
Form Number: Pro Se 11
Category: Civil Pro Se Forms
Effective onDecember 1, 2016
2022년 10월 7일 현재 미국 법원에서 사용중인 민사소송 Third Party Complaint 서식입니다.
제3자고소 Third Party Complaint 는 피고인(제3자원고) defendant (the third-party plaintiff) 이 원소송의당사자는아니지만 who is not a party to the original lawsuit 원고의청구에서전체또는일부에대해책임을질수있는사람 but who may be liable for all or part of the plaintiff's claim 을 상대로 제기하는 것입니다.
이것은피고가원고의손해나부상에책임이있다고믿는다른당사자를소송에참여시
키는방법 it is a way for a defendant to bring another party into a lawsuit who they believe may also be responsible for the plaintiff's damages or injuries 으로, 그렇게 함으로써 피고는법원에자신과제3자피고를포함한여러당사자들과본질적으로손해를 배분하도록요청 by doing so, the defendant is essentially asking the court to apportion the damages among multiple parties, including themselves and the third-party defendant 하는 것입니다.
이것은 주로 원소송에포함되지않은 not named in the original lawsuit 제3자 피고를 원고가청구하는손해의일부또는전부에책임이있다 is responsible for some or all of the damages being claimed by the plaintiff 고 믿는 피고(제3자원고)가 제3자 피고를 개입시키려고 제기하고 그러면 제3자피고 the third-party defendant 는 제3자원고 the third-party plaintiff 가 제기한 청구에 대응해야 합니다.
다음은 미국 법원에 주로 제소된 제3자고소 Third Party Complaint 사례들입니다.
- 한 건설회사가 리노베이션 프로젝트에서 부실시공 faulty work 으로 주택소유자로부터 소송을 당했고, 이에 건설회사는 하청업체 the subcontractor they hired 가 실제로모든손해에책임이있다 alleging that the subcontractor is actually responsible for any damages 고 제3자고소함.
- 자동차 제조업체가 자동차사고로부상당한 was injured in a car accident 소비자 a consumer 로 부터 소송을 당했고 제조업체는 사고를 유발한 결함부품의공급업체 the supplier of the defective part 를 상대로 책임을 분담해야 한다고 제3자 고소함.
- 퇴사한 직원이 차별을 이유로 전고용주를 고발했고 이에 전고용주는 전직원의 새 고용주가 시장경쟁에서우위를 확보하고자그직원이소송을제기하도록부추겼다 alleging that they encouraged the employee to file the lawsuit in order to gain a competitive advantage 하면서 전직원의 새 고용주를 상대로 제3자 고소함.
다음은 미국 대법원의 제3자고소 Third Party Complaint 관련 판례들입니다.
1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Erie R. Co. (1958). 이 사건은 두 철도회사의 운임할당방법에 대한 분쟁 two railroad companies were involved in a dispute over the proper way to allocate freight charges 으로, 제3의철도회사가배분에서부당한혜택을받았다고제3자고소를제기 to bring a third-party complaint against a third railroad company that had allegedly received an unfair advantage in the allocation 했고, 이에 대법원은궁극적으로연방민사소송규칙에따라제3자고소가허용된다 the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the third-party complaint was permissible under federal rules of civil procedure.고 판결.
2. Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982). 이 사건에서 전직대통령보좌관 a former presidential aide 인 Harlow 씨는 백악관의 내부고발자 whistleblower 인 Fitzgerald 씨가 제기한 헌법상권리를침해한혐의로고소 was sued for allegedly violating the constitutional rights of 를 당했고, 여기서 Harlow 씨는 내부고발자 whistleblower 의 고용주인연방정부 employer, the federal government 에 대해서 정부가위반혐의에기여했다고주장 arguing that the government had contributed to the alleged violations 하면서 제3자고소를제기 to bring a third-party complaint against 했음. 이에 대법원은 궁극적으로 Harlow 씨가 면책특권을누렸기때문에정부에대해제3자고소를제기할수없다 could not bring a third-party complaint against the government because it enjoyed qualified immunity 고 판결.
3 United States v. Haddon Hauling Service, Inc. (1983). 이 사건에서 정부는한고속도로의중량제한을위반한트럭회사를상대로소송을제기 the government brought a lawsuit against a trucking company for violating weight restrictions on certain highways 했고, 이에그회사는아이다호주가문제의고속도로에서과적트럭의운행을허용했다고며
제3자고소 in turn, brought a third-party complaint against the state of Idaho, alleging that the state had allowed overweight trucks to operate on the highways in question 를 했음. 이에 대법원은 궁극적으로 주는수정헌법제11조에따라그러한소송에서면제 the state was immune from such lawsuits under the Eleventh Amendment 되기 때문에 트럭회사가 주를 상대로 제3자 소송을 제기할 수 없다고 판결.
4. Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc. (2002). 이 사건은 Holmes 사가 Vornado 사를 상대로 가습기특허침해소송 filed a lawsuit for infringing on its patents for a type of humidifier 을 했고, 이에 Vornado 사는 자신의한공급업체가Holmes사의특허를침해했다고제3자고소 filed a third-party complaint against one of its suppliers, alleging that the supplier had provided Vornado with components that infringed on Holmes Group's patents 를 제기한 것에 대해, 이에 대법원은 공급업체가이소송에서필수적인당사자가아니기때문에제3자고소가적절하게 기각되었다 the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the third-party complaint was properly dismissed because the supplier was not a necessary party to the lawsuit 고 판결.
5. United States v. Williams (2002). 이 사건에서 정부는 허위주장법위반혐의 for allegedly violating the False Claims Act 로 Williams Brothers 사에 소송을 제기했고 Williams Brothers는 정부에허위주장을제출한것으로알려진두명의전직원에게제3자고소를제기 sought to bring a third-party complaint against two former employees who had allegedly submitted false claims to the government 했고 이에 정부가원소송에제3자고소개입을거부 even though the government had declined to intervene in the original lawsuit 했음에도 불구하고, 대법원은 Williams Brothers 사가 전직원에게제3자고소를제기할수있다 could bring the third-party complaint against the former employees 고 판결.
6. Hertz Corp. v. Friend (2010). 이 사건은 캘리포니아 직원들이 고용주인 Hertz Corp. 을 상대로 초과근무수당을지급하지않았다는이유 for allegedly failing to pay overtime wages 로 소송을 제기했고, Hertz Corp. 는 이에직원을대표하는노동조합을상대로제3자고소를제기 in turn, filed a third-party complaint against a union that had represented the employees 하여 노조가공정한대표의무를위반 the union had breached its duty of fair representation 했다고 주장. 이에 대법원은 궁극적으로Hertz Corp. 가 노사관계법상금지대상이아니므로노조를 상대로제3자소송을제기할수있다 the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that Hertz Corp. could bring the third-party complaint against the union because it was not barred by the Labor Management Relations Act 고 판결함.
7. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. (2014). 이 사건은 Lanham Act 에 따른 허위광고 false advertising 소송으로 대법원은 거짓 광고로 인해 상업 이익, 명예, 매출 등의 손실이 발생한 경우 피해를 입은 회사가 소송을 제기할 수 있다고 판결함. (Lanham Act는 1946년에 제정된 미국의 상표와 허위광고에 대한 법률로 Federal Trade Commission Act, Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act 와 함께 미국의 대표적인 경제법규이다. 상표등록 및 유지, 상표침해 및 위조, 허위광고 등과 관련된 법적절차 및 대응방안을 규정하는데 특히 허위광고에 대한 법적책임과 손해배상에 대해 기업, 상표등록자, 소비자 등 이해관계자들에게 중요한 법적보호를 제공한다.)
각 국가의 법원들은 고유의 소송 서식을 사용하므로 더 추가되는 내용들이 있지만 기본적으로 요구하는 내용은 크게 다르지 않아서 다른 국가와 비슷한 사건일 경우 본 내용을 참고하시기 바랍니다.
소송이 필요한 국가의 현지 변호사와 상담이나 번역과 통역을 원하시면 이메일 info@ilri.co.kr 로 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.
Pro Se 11 (Rev. 12/16) Third–Party Complaint
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
__________ District of __________
__________ Division
Case No.
(to be filled in by the Clerk’s Office)
Plaintiff(s)
(Write the full name of each plaintiff who is filing this complaint.
If the names of all the plaintiffs cannot fit in the space above,
please write “see attached” in the space and attach an additional
page with the full list of names.)
-v- Jury Trial: (check one) ’ Yes ’ No
Defendant, Third–party plaintiff(s)
(Write the full name of each defendant/third–party plaintiff. If the
names of all the defendants/third–party plaintiffs cannot fit in the
space above, please write “see attached” in the space and attach
an additional page with the full list of names.)
-v-
Third–party defendant(s)
(Write the full name of each third–party defendant. If the names
of all the third–party defendants cannot fit in the space above,
please write “see attached” in the space and attach an additional
page with the full list of names.)
THIRD – PARTY COMPLAINT
I. The Parties to This Complaint
A. The Plaintiff(s)
Provide the information below for each plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach additional pages if
needed.
Name
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Page 1 of 5
B. The Defendant(s)/Third–Party Plaintiff(s)
Provide the information below for each defendant/third–party plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach
additional pages if needed.
Name
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
C. The Third–Party Defendant(s)
Provide the information below for each third–party defendant named in the complaint, whether the
third–party defendant is an individual, a government agency, an organization, or a corporation. For an
individual third–party defendant, include the person’s job or title (if known). Attach additional pages if
needed.
Third–Party Defendant No. 1
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Third–Party Defendant No. 2
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Page 2 of 5
Third–Party Defendant No. 3
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Third–Party Defendant No. 4
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
II. Initial Complaint
A. Identify the initial complaint filed against you and the date it was filed. Describe the events that gave
rise to the plaintiff's complaint, the nature of the claims asserted, and the relief sought. Attach the
complaint as an exhibit.
B. State whether you have filed an answer to the complaint and, if so, briefly summarize what admissions
or denials that answer asserted. Attach the answer as an exhibit.
III. Third–Party Complaint
A. Describe the nature of the relationship between you and the third–party defendant. Attach any contracts
or documents showing the nature of the relationship.
Page 3 of 5
B. Explain why, if the plaintiff received any judgment against you, you will be entitled to judgment against
the third–party defendant for contribution to or indemnification for the amount of damages and costs
awarded to the plaintiff. Include the percentage of the plaintiff's recovery that the third–party defendant
will be required to contribute. Describe the facts, or relevant provisions of state law, that demonstrate
you are entitled to collect from the third–party defendant.
IV. Certification and Closing
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, by signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge, information,
and belief that this complaint: (1) is not being presented for an improper purpose, such as to harass, cause
unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; (2) is supported by existing law or by a
nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law; (3) the factual contentions have
evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable
opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the complaint otherwise complies with the
requirements of Rule 11.
A. For Parties Without an Attorney
I agree to provide the Clerk’s Office with any changes to my address where case–related papers may be
served. I understand that my failure to keep a current address on file with the Clerk’s Office may result
in the dismissal of my case.
Date of signing:
Signature of Defendant/Third–Party Plaintiff
Printed Name of Defendant/Third–Party Plaintiff
B. For Attorneys
Date of signing:
Signature of Attorney
Printed Name of Attorney
Bar Number
Page 4 of 5
Name of Law Firm
Street Address
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
Page 5 of 5
국제법 전문가 그룹 - 국제법률연구원
Highly specialized in international law ㅡ International Legal Research Institute
Email 📮 info@ilri.co.kr Website 🌎 www.ilri.co.kr
📞 [Korea 82] (0)507-1350-0621, (0)2-557-3476
📱 (0)10-5295-0621
(Free E-mail Consultation: Please send your inquiry to info@ilri.co.kr for consultation with lawyers in different time zone countries.)
Law Dept. (0)507-1351-0621 law@ilri.co.kr | Education Dept. (0)507-1352-0621 education@ilri.co.kr | Finance Dept. (0)507-1353-0621 finance@ilri.co.kr | Administration Dept. administration@ilri.co.kr | Press Dept. press@ilri.co.kr
#국제법 #국제계약 #국제법률연구원 #신동화 #International Law #ilri #ILRI #International Legal Research Institute #ilri.co.kr
|
|
|
)
)
)
