|
|
- Written by Salomone Donghwa Shin / International Legal Research Institute. www.ilri.co.kr
Complaint for Violation of Fair Labor Standards
Form Number: Pro Se 8
Category: Civil Pro Se Forms
Effective onDecember 1, 2016
2022년 7월 1일 현재 미국 법원에서 사용중인 민사소송 Complaint for Violation of Fair Labor Standards 서식입니다.
근로기준법위반고발(공정한노동기준위반) Complaint for Violation of Fair Labor Standards 은 근로자가 고용주를 상대로 근로기준법(공정한노동기준) Fair Labor Standards Act(FLSA) 위반에 대해 법적청구를 하는 것입니다.
이 미국 근로기준법 FLSA(Fair Labor Standards Act) 근로자에 대한 최저임금 minimum wage, 초과근무수당 overtime pay, 근무기록보관 recordkeeping, 아동노동기준 child labor standards 을 설정하는 연방법 federal law 으로서 노동부소관 is administered by the U.S. Department of Labor 입니다.
고용주가 근로기준법 FLSA 를 위반했으면 근로자가 노동부에 신고하거나 고용주를 상대로 미지급임금 unpaid wages, 초과근무 overtime 및 FLSA 위반에 대해 개인적으로 손해배상 소송을 제기할 수 may file a private lawsuit against 있습니다.
다음은 미국 대법원의 근로기준법위반(공정한노동기준) Complaint for Violation of Fair Labor Standards 관련 판례입니다.
1. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.(2010): 대법원은 근로기준법 FLSA 이 지리적 한계를 넘은 미국 외에서 일하는 근로자들에게는 적용되지 않는다고 판단함. 이 판결은 미국증권법의치외법권범위를명확히하여 clarified the limits of the extraterritorial reach of U.S. securities laws 외국에서벌어진행위와관련된사건에서관할권주장에더엄격한기준을마련 providing a stricter standard for asserting jurisdiction in cases involving foreign conduct 했으며, 이는 미국외부에서발생한행위에미국증권법에따른청구를하는외국투자자를제한 has limited the ability of foreign investors to bring claims under U.S. securities laws for conduct occurring outside the United States 할 수 있게 함.
2. Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. (2012): 이 사건에서 Michael Christopher 씨와 Frank Buchanan 씨는 GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) 에서 근무했으며 공정노동기준법에따라초과근무 수당을청구 claimed overtime pay under the FLSA 했음. 그들은 29 USC § 207(a)에 따라 직원이라고 주장했고, GSK는 그들이 § 213(a)에 따라 '외부영업사원자격 in the capacity of outside salesman' 으로 활동했다고 주장함. 이에 대법원은 제약회사의 영업인은 근로기준법 FLSA 의 초과근무수당요건 overtime pay requirements 에서 제외되는 외부영업 outside sales 범주에 속한여 제약회사의 상품을 홍보 promotion 하는 업무를 하므로 이는 판매와 유사하여 초과근무수당 제외대상에 해당된다고 판결함.
3. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk (2014): 이 사건은 Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. 사가 Amazon.com에인력서비스를제공하여창고직원을고용 provided staffing services to Amazon.com and employed workers at its warehouses 했는데, 노동자들이절도방지보안검색에대기하는시간을보상받아야한다며소송 the workers filed a lawsuit, claiming that they should be compensated for the time spent waiting in security screenings, which were conducted to prevent theft 을 했고 이에 대법원은 그 보안검색이정규근무교대를마친후에 the screenings occurred after the employees had finished their regular work shifts 행해진 것을 직업에필수적인주요활동과예비또는사후활동을구분 distinguished between principal activities that are integral to the job and activities that are preliminary or postliminary 하는 FLSA 및 Portal-to-Portal Act 법을 기반으로 해석하였음. 대법원은 직원들이 근무시간 마친 후 보안검색을기다리는 waiting to undergo security screenings 시간이 근로기준법 FLSA 에 따른 보상대상이 아니라며, 검색이 직원들의 주업무 primary job duties 에 필수적이지않고 indispensable 중요요소가아니라는 not integral 이유로 보상대상이 아니라고 판결함. the security screenings were non-compensable postliminary activities since they were not directly related to the employees' principal activities and were not an essential part of their job duties.
4. Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.(2014): 대법원은 공정근로기준법(29 U.S.C.S. § 203(o)) § 3(o)에따라보호 장비를장착하는데소요된시간은 § 3(o)에 따라 "옷갈아입는것"에해당하므로보상할수없다 the time spent donning and doffing protective gear were not compensable under § 3(o) of Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C.S. § 203(o)), as the activities were “changing clothes” under § 3(o) 고 판결했으며, 노조가 그 시간에 급여를 요구하지 않은 단체교섭협정체결을해서보상받을수없다 and apparently noncompensable under the collective-bargaining agreement고 판결함. 그러나 비의류품목을입고벗는시간이직원의주요활동에통합되고필수불가결해서FLSA에
따른보상가능사항을충족하는경우보상가능하다고명시 stated that time spent donning and doffing non-clothing items could still be compensable if it met the requirements for compensable work time under the FLSA, such as being integral and indispensable to the employee's principal activities 했으나, 각직원이보안경과귀마개를장착하는데소요되는시간은미미했음 the time expended by each employee donning and doffing safety glasses and earplugs was minimal.
5. Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.(2015): 대법원은 임신한 직원 Peggy Young이 UPS 고용주로부터 가벼운 업무 할당을 거부당하면 임신차별방지법 Pregnancy Discrimination Act(PDA) 및 근로기준법(FLSA)에 따라 고발할 수 있다며 고용주가 비슷한 상황의 다른 직원들에게는 조치를 취했지만 그녀에게만 조치를 취하지 않았으므로 고용주의 차별을 추가심리하기위해항소법원으로파기환송 remanded the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further proceedings 함.
6. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo(2016): 대법원은 Tyson Foods 근로자들이 FLSA 및 주법에 따라 무급초과근무 unpaid overtime 에 대해 고용주를 고발할 수 있다고 판결. 대법원은 근로자들의 주장을 증명하는 통계증거가 부적절하다는 Tyson Foods의 주장을 기각하고, 고용주는 근로자들이 보호장비착탈에소요되는시간에비용을지불하지않는통상적관행 had a common practice of not paying for time spent putting on and taking off protective equipment 이 있음을 고려함.
7. Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro (2018): 대법원은 자동차서비스어드바이저 automobile service advisors 는 판매원에 해당하여 근로기준법(FLSA)에 따른 초과근무수당제외 exempt from overtime pay 대상이라고 판결함. 그들이 초과근무요건에서제외 exempt from the FLSA overtime requirement 되는 이유는 고객서비스를판매하는판매원이기때문에 because they were salesmen primarily engaged in servicing cars since they sold customers services for their vehicles 또한고객을만나고수리및유지보수를제안및판매하는서비스프로세스에종사했기
때문 and they were also primarily engaged in servicing cars since they were integral to the servicing process as they met customers, suggested and sold repair and maintenance services, and followed up as the services were performed 이라고 판단하였고, 그들이 대부분의시간을자동차수리에사용하지않았지만 did not spend most of their time physically repairing cars, 그러나 29 U.S.C.S. § 213(b)(10)(A) 조항은 그렇게강제적이지않았으며 was not so constrained "판매"와"서비스"를결합하기위해"또는"이라는분리접속사를사용하여서둘중하
나에종사하는판매원에적용 use of the disjunctive word "or" to join "selling" and "servicing" suggested that the exemption covered a salesman primarily engaged in either activity 된다고 판결함.
각 국가의 법원들은 고유의 소송 서식을 사용하므로 더 추가되는 내용들이 있지만 기본적으로 요구하는 내용은 크게 다르지 않아서 다른 국가와 비슷한 사건일 경우 본 내용을 참고하시기 바랍니다.
소송이 필요한 국가의 현지 변호사와 상담이나 번역과 통역을 원하시면 이메일 info@ilri.co.kr 로 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.
Pro Se 8 (Rev. 12/16) Complaint for Violation of Fair Labor Standards
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
__________ District of __________
__________ Division
Case No.
(to be filled in by the Clerk’s Office)
ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ Jury Trial: (check one) ' Yes ’ No
Plaintiff(s)
(Write the full name of each plaintiff who is filing this complaint.
If the names of all the plaintiffs cannot fit in the space above,
please write “see attached” in the space and attach an additional
page with the full list of names.)
-v-
ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ
Defendant(s)
(Write the full name of each defendant who is being sued. If the
names of all the defendants cannot fit in the space above, please
write “see attached” in the space and attach an additional page
with the full list of names.)
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS
I. The Parties to This Complaint
A. The Plaintiff(s)
Provide the information below for each plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach additional pages if
needed.
Name
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
B. The Defendant(s)
Provide the information below for each defendant named in the complaint, whether the defendant is an
individual, a government agency, an organization, or a corporation. For an individual defendant,
include the person’s job or title (if known). Attach additional pages if needed.
Defendant No. 1
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Defendant No. 2
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Defendant No. 3
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
Defendant No. 4
Name
Job or Title (if known)
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address (if known)
C. Place of Employment
The address at which I am employed or was employed by the defendant(s) is
Name
Street Address
City and County
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
II. Basis for Jurisdiction
This action is brought pursuant to (check all that apply):
’ Fair Labor Standards Act, as codified, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 to 209.
’ Relevant state law
’ Relevant city or county law
III. Statement of Claim
State as briefly as possible the facts of your case. You may wish to include further details such as the names of other persons involved in the events giving rise to your claims. Do not cite any cases. If more than one claim is asserted, number each claim and write a short and plain statement of each claim in a separate paragraph. Attach additional pages if needed.
A. Nature of employer’s business:
B. Dates of employment:
C. Employee’s job title and a description of the kind of work done:
D. Rate, method, and frequency of wage payment:
E. Number of hours actually worked each week in which a violation is claimed:
F. Description of the alleged violation(s) (check all that apply):
’ Failure to pay the minimum wage (explain)
’ Failure to pay required overtime (explain)
’ Other violation(s) (explain)
G. Date(s) of the alleged violation(s):
H. Additional facts:
IV. Relief
State briefly and precisely what damages or other relief the plaintiff asks the court to order. Do not make legal arguments. Include any basis for claiming that the wrongs alleged are continuing at the present time. Include the amounts of any actual damages claimed for the acts alleged and the basis for these amounts. Include any punitive or exemplary damages claimed, the amounts, and the reasons you claim you are entitled to actual or punitive money damages.
V. Certification and Closing
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, by signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief that this complaint: (1) is not being presented for an improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; (2) is supported by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law; (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the complaint otherwise complies with the
requirements of Rule 11.
A. For Parties Without an Attorney
I agree to provide the Clerk’s Office with any changes to my address where case–related papers may be served. I understand that my failure to keep a current address on file with the Clerk’s Office may result in the dismissal of my case.
Date of signing:
Signature of Plaintiff
Printed Name of Plaintiff
B. For Attorneys
Date of signing:
Signature of Attorney
Printed Name of Attorney
Bar Number
Name of Law Firm
Street Address
State and Zip Code
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
국제법 전문가 그룹 - 국제법률연구원
Highly specialized in international law ㅡ International Legal Research Institute
Email 📮 info@ilri.co.kr Website 🌎 www.ilri.co.kr
Phone 📞 [Korea 82] (0)507-1350-0621, (0)2-557-3476
Mobile 📱 (0)10-5295-0621
Free E-mail Consultation: Please send your inquiry to info@ilri.co.kr for consultation with lawyers in different time zone countries.
Law Dept. (0)507-1351-0621 law@ilri.co.kr | Education Dept. (0)507-1352-0621 education@ilri.co.kr | Finance Dept. (0)507-1353-0621 finance@ilri.co.kr | Administration Dept. administration@ilri.co.kr | Press Dept. press@ilri.co.kr
#국제법 #국제계약 #국제법률연구원 #신동화 #International Law #ilri #ILRI #International Legal Research Institute #ilri.co.kr |
|
|
)
)
)
